Great job as usual, your letter is precise, legally grounded, and right to the point.

All the government has to do . . . . is their job.

Very sad to read about the young people you cited who died, the pharma companies, media, and bureaucrats who precipitated this holocaust (I've seen estimates between 10 and 20 million killed worldwide by the exp gene therapies) MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.

God Bless you and your work and good luck!

Expand full comment


"Is yer vaksine safe and effective?"

"Yes, it is."

Takes it, has stroke.

"I thought you said it was safe and effective?!"

"Not fer everybody."

Expand full comment

Well done! I can't wait to read your next Substack with her response.

Expand full comment

"...that you lack standing..."

This is their exit ramp.

"Article III, Section 2, Clause 1:

The Judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."

"The standing rules apply to actions brought in federal courts, and they have no direct application to actions brought in state courts. 7"

Endnote 7 : Standing: "Thus, state courts could adjudicate a case brought by a person who had no standing in the federal sense. If the plaintiff lost, he would have no recourse in the U.S. Supreme Court, because of his lack of standing, Tileston v. Ullman, 318 U.S. 44 (1943); Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 429 (1952), but if plaintiff prevailed, the losing defendant might be able to appeal, because he might be able to assert sufficient injury to his federal interests. ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish, 490 U.S. 605 (1989).




They are demons. They know they are demons as this is what, through free will, they chose.

The deaths, the fraud, the entire chain of consequences all reinforce and justify, to them, they are demons. If they had to do it all over, they would still choose to be demons.

I pray you will be able to cast out the demons.

I pray further you will continue to receive the strength to carry this battle forth to a just conclusion.

Your work is excellent.

You speak for the dead and debilitated.

May your voice never be silenced, rather may the multitude hear it proclaimed from the rooftops.

Expand full comment


Expand full comment

You've written an excellent response. I hope it does what it should do.

Expand full comment

I expect these creeps to punk out as usual. Thanks for pulling their card in advance. I'll be referring people to your latest work with Strokes on The New Prisoners this week. Just keep challenging them brother. More are noticing every day.

Expand full comment

Good for you!

There will be a lot of lawyers at your conference this weekend so maybe see if they can apply some added pressure, pro bono of course. I have little faith in these Attorney Generals yet Dr. David Martin might have made some headway with a couple as he approached them all. David can be emailed at dem@m-cam.com. At minimal, you'll want to get those wrongful deaths to him and his lawyer friend Stanford Graham. They have built something special for the victims. Stanford's email is stan@getyourelements.com. They both run www prosecutenow.io

John 11:11 shows us ultimate faith

I'm Harvard ReviewĚd || Ed_Harvard btw

Bless your efforts,

Expand full comment

I would counsel you to address the issue at hand: standing.

Who is John Beaudoin Sr to bring this case to the court of Massachusetts for adjudication?

You will need to prove you are a "person aggrieved" (or US legal equivalent) under Massachusetts Court rules to bring the case. That term might be a useful search term for Massachusetts and other US case law.

The fact that residents of Massachusetts are being harmed is sadly not enough to establish *your* standing to bring your grievance to trial . You must demonstrate the relevance of their harms to your particular circumstances.

This is how cases are lost on standing. One significant one here in Oz was Australian Vaccination Risks Network (AVN) v TGA, trying to force these crap vaccines to be withdrawn. Our Federal Court found that AVN was not a "person aggrieved" and therefore had no standing to bring the case.


It was appealed to the full board which also failed.


This is one of the ways these criminals love to make cases like yours disappear quietly while children and adults continue to suffer and die at the hands of these satanic torturers.

The Living God be with you, and grant you every word to say in that hour.



Expand full comment

Yes, there is a correlation:

use of graphene oxide is such a correlation


Expand full comment
Mar 24Liked by Coquin de Chien

Is there any point to us calling her office and emailing her office? I live in Massachusetts. More importantly, I live in America. This is all wrong!

Expand full comment

All for a virus which poses no meaningful risk of mortality for the vast majority (zero for healthy youngsters), as has been evident from infection fatality rate data since mid 2020. If the average American would turn off the politicized trash we call corporate media and do even a little homework this fraud never could have been foisted upon our society.

Expand full comment

The courts love to throw out cases that would embarrass the government by using the “lack standing” defense. Good luck to you and your case.

Expand full comment

Well done

Expand full comment
Mar 24Liked by Coquin de Chien

Hi mr Beaudoin

I try to catch you under this your fresh letter. You can quickly learn that Covid-19, if fact, is by far not such a danger as the official data say, due to mass-wrong attributing death to Covid-19, what has already been proven by the original math method.

= It is not possible to hide the real (and in fact small) number of genuine Covid-19 deaths and to falsely tell that most of excess deaths were caused by Covid-19. ...At present (from October) the proof is available in the based in Switzerland major preprint (as not censored there by its ediors):


The proof is at the moment available only to reading and referring to.

Kind regards, Rafal (the main author)

Expand full comment

BOOM! You just blasted her off the planet with that email! You rock! Never give up; never give in. We fight for those who can no longer fight for themselves.

Expand full comment