Wouldn't it be necessary, in order to include vaccination data on everyone's Death Certificates, to first have that information somewhere else? This idea seems well-intentioned, but keeping track of people's "vaccination status" seems a TERRIBLE idea, to me. I can see ALL KINDS of problems with that, and with having anyone's medical history available to anyone but the patient and the doctor when necessary, which is now overrun by having everything hackable... I think privacy has been utterly shredded already. This will only make it easier to target people for whatever reason. Seems to me, anyway. Convince me otherwise, anyone.
I strongly favor the data transparency, but I’m worried about keeping immunization registries. This has a serious privacy risk, especially given the agenda to use vaccination status as an entry point for global digital ID.
I think the way to address this is to keep that status within health records, but make the anonymized data extraction from health records open source. Right now this exists as things like the VISION network where EHR data is centralized from a couple hundred hospitals. This could be broadened or perhaps universalized, but privacy protections on disclosure of or differential treatment by vaccination status strengthened, and all data analysts have free access to the automatically anonymized data sets.
CdC went to great lengths in their "cause of causes" post to establish suspicion. If their claims are true, an analysis that directly compared outcomes by vaccination status would undoubtedly yield statistically significant evidence. Yet CdC made no effort to test their hypothesis this obvious and potentially conclusive avenue of investigation.
Of course it would be ideal to have that vaccination data in the death certificates, but that's far from the only possibility. Within Mass., they could have assessed whether the differential rates of vaccination by county have a correlating difference in the cardiovascular deaths they find suspicious. Or data from other states or other countries could have been examined. The list, surely, goes on.
Instead, they declared any more conclusive proof impossible, bizarrely equating evidence of causation of past events to perfect prediction of future events:
> Only yesterday, a familiar told this author,
> “You cannot prove that the deaths are linked to the vax.”
> No one can prove today that the sun will not emit
> a flare that will destroy all life on Earth tomorrow.
Huh??
And now we get this post. If only the state of Massachusetts would make this change to death records, we could have proof! This is obviously not going happen, so will CdC look elsewhere? Surely resolving such an urgent matter of life and death cannot be left to hinge on a hail mary appeal to a state bureaucracy to retroactively revise their recording keeping. Right?
We have very good data from the UK on Covid and non-Covid deaths, which include vax deaths. Steve Kirsch has used it to show poor risk-benefit ratios for nearly every age group. Germany also publishes good data, but all the interesting papers I've seen on it are in German. Here's the UK data link.
Please do not use PayPal. It is a criminal organization, and could keep your money at any time if it doesn't like what you post.
Wouldn't it be necessary, in order to include vaccination data on everyone's Death Certificates, to first have that information somewhere else? This idea seems well-intentioned, but keeping track of people's "vaccination status" seems a TERRIBLE idea, to me. I can see ALL KINDS of problems with that, and with having anyone's medical history available to anyone but the patient and the doctor when necessary, which is now overrun by having everything hackable... I think privacy has been utterly shredded already. This will only make it easier to target people for whatever reason. Seems to me, anyway. Convince me otherwise, anyone.
I strongly favor the data transparency, but I’m worried about keeping immunization registries. This has a serious privacy risk, especially given the agenda to use vaccination status as an entry point for global digital ID.
I think the way to address this is to keep that status within health records, but make the anonymized data extraction from health records open source. Right now this exists as things like the VISION network where EHR data is centralized from a couple hundred hospitals. This could be broadened or perhaps universalized, but privacy protections on disclosure of or differential treatment by vaccination status strengthened, and all data analysts have free access to the automatically anonymized data sets.
CdC went to great lengths in their "cause of causes" post to establish suspicion. If their claims are true, an analysis that directly compared outcomes by vaccination status would undoubtedly yield statistically significant evidence. Yet CdC made no effort to test their hypothesis this obvious and potentially conclusive avenue of investigation.
Of course it would be ideal to have that vaccination data in the death certificates, but that's far from the only possibility. Within Mass., they could have assessed whether the differential rates of vaccination by county have a correlating difference in the cardiovascular deaths they find suspicious. Or data from other states or other countries could have been examined. The list, surely, goes on.
Instead, they declared any more conclusive proof impossible, bizarrely equating evidence of causation of past events to perfect prediction of future events:
> Only yesterday, a familiar told this author,
> “You cannot prove that the deaths are linked to the vax.”
> No one can prove today that the sun will not emit
> a flare that will destroy all life on Earth tomorrow.
Huh??
And now we get this post. If only the state of Massachusetts would make this change to death records, we could have proof! This is obviously not going happen, so will CdC look elsewhere? Surely resolving such an urgent matter of life and death cannot be left to hinge on a hail mary appeal to a state bureaucracy to retroactively revise their recording keeping. Right?
We have very good data from the UK on Covid and non-Covid deaths, which include vax deaths. Steve Kirsch has used it to show poor risk-benefit ratios for nearly every age group. Germany also publishes good data, but all the interesting papers I've seen on it are in German. Here's the UK data link.
https://archive.ph/kch6d