Here in the jab crazy UK, everyone we know who has rec’d their spring booster are sicker than dogs. Not enough culled in the first six rounds. Have to keep going. The elderly and vulnerable on the hit list this spring. Doing my best to warn anyone thinking of taking their 7th jab, but they just shake their heads, like I am the crazy one.
What I see is that the death certificates often say pretty much any bland thing like 'cause unknown' and that's tyhe end of it, even if they do know full well the causal agent. In the face of no autopsy, or even a basic one, there is no evidence gained for even a probable cause. More importantly, without propeer analysis there is no scope for blame and come back for improper description on the cert.
Sure, these people aka certifying doctors are supposed to be squeaky clean and only tell the truth on pain of losing licences. It seems to me that the more honest a doc is the more likely they are to be eliminated. The more of these descriptions I read, in the context of all the other truths which have been exposed around corruption and censorship, the more I distrust any of it.
What we can glean is only as good as the information we are presented with. When that is corrupted for whatever reason we stay in the dark. When it is clearly seen that so much data for death and illness has been misassigned, wilfully or no, I struggle to accept these things at face value.
Thanks Coquin de Chien. It's always good to read your writing.
Over 50% of obituaries are under 70. I collect data from 6 different funeral homes in TN.
I’m no data analyst but it’s been horrifying as I have read obits for 30 years and of course there has never been anything like this before. It used to be a small percentage of individuals under 70 in obituaries. Rare because it was typically an accident, a suicide or a health calamity that medical industry couldn’t fix. All rare for under 75
All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.
Conclusions
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.” Plos One, Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary Immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus, 8.9.2012.
Here in the jab crazy UK, everyone we know who has rec’d their spring booster are sicker than dogs. Not enough culled in the first six rounds. Have to keep going. The elderly and vulnerable on the hit list this spring. Doing my best to warn anyone thinking of taking their 7th jab, but they just shake their heads, like I am the crazy one.
It's very interesting.
What I see is that the death certificates often say pretty much any bland thing like 'cause unknown' and that's tyhe end of it, even if they do know full well the causal agent. In the face of no autopsy, or even a basic one, there is no evidence gained for even a probable cause. More importantly, without propeer analysis there is no scope for blame and come back for improper description on the cert.
Sure, these people aka certifying doctors are supposed to be squeaky clean and only tell the truth on pain of losing licences. It seems to me that the more honest a doc is the more likely they are to be eliminated. The more of these descriptions I read, in the context of all the other truths which have been exposed around corruption and censorship, the more I distrust any of it.
What we can glean is only as good as the information we are presented with. When that is corrupted for whatever reason we stay in the dark. When it is clearly seen that so much data for death and illness has been misassigned, wilfully or no, I struggle to accept these things at face value.
Thanks Coquin de Chien. It's always good to read your writing.
You can easily search current VAERS at https://matchyourbatch.org
Newly launched free and powerful. Deep dive into symptoms and view detailed symptom descriptions.
matchyourbatch.substack.com for more info
John- you are relentless! More power to you.
Bonnie from Ipswich, MA
We met in Concord
Over 50% of obituaries are under 70. I collect data from 6 different funeral homes in TN.
I’m no data analyst but it’s been horrifying as I have read obits for 30 years and of course there has never been anything like this before. It used to be a small percentage of individuals under 70 in obituaries. Rare because it was typically an accident, a suicide or a health calamity that medical industry couldn’t fix. All rare for under 75
Not anymore. It’s absolutely alarming.
All vaccines induced serum neutralizing antibody with increasing dosages and/or alum significantly increasing responses. Significant reductions of SARS-CoV two days after challenge was seen for all vaccines and prior live SARS-CoV. All mice exhibited histopathologic changes in lungs two days after challenge including all animals vaccinated (Balb/C and C57BL/6) or given live virus, influenza vaccine, or PBS suggesting infection occurred in all. Histopathology seen in animals given one of the SARS-CoV vaccines was uniformly a Th2-type immunopathology with prominent eosinophil infiltration, confirmed with special eosinophil stains. The pathologic changes seen in all control groups lacked the eosinophil prominence.
Conclusions
These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.” Plos One, Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary Immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus, 8.9.2012.
The Rosetta stone is in MIIS! They will never willingly reveal it.
Connection
Good Info