I have to make a couple of points... In the US Constitution, there is no time or "emergency" that allows for a "suspension of rights" that includes a mandatory invasive medical procedure, forced isolation of the healthy, medical directives like mask-wearing being forced on healthy people, nor an implementation of Martial Law without Due Cause, which must be PROVEN, not simply asserted. There occurred in the US, including Massachusetts, a great deal of fuckery, including monetized, outright lying about Cause of Death, monetized assignment of diagnoses of "Covid," lies regarding the patient load of hospitals, "truckloads" of dead bodies being removed from hospitals, symptom of "covid" patients, strange mass deaths in residential facilities for the elderly, flagrant misuse of the PCR (the entire basis of the "pandemic" and utterly, and knowingly, fraudulent), and copious other lies, such as mandating masks, which are utterly useless in anything to do with "viruses," and harmful "on the face" of it, cheap and highly effective drugs were pulled off the shelves (HCQ and later IVM) very early on, and during the entire two years of Crimes Against Humanity, fear mongering was on full throttle from the beginning. All for something that was actually a patented bio-weapon and/or radiation poisoning with a 99.9% survival rate, which stomped the basis for the EUA situation from the beginning. Due to the fraud of mis-representation of Cause of Death, the monetization of diagnostics AND treatment, AND the outcome (ongoing) of the inoculation campaign, we can draw no other conclusion that this is Genocide, plain and simple. The Yearly Death Rate numbers in 2020 were not particularly different from the previous ten years for the US, but the sharp rise in deaths in the Spring of 2021 and continuing to current time, show nothing less than a pointing finger at the these "vaccines," which do not prevent transmission, nor the "disease" (most likely more of the bio-weapon itself, or 5G, or both). The clear evidence that at least some of the jabs contained graphene oxide and other metallic elements such as aluminum and mercury, for example, which are reactive with 5G, and toxic even without it, is very obvious hints that there is a global cull going on.
Why we are not seeing more lawsuits, especially after copious evidence has been gathered for this purpose by Reiner Fuellmich and his colleagues is a question, though lawsuits are notorious, at least in the US, for being infuriatingly SLOW. I've probably stepped on your toes with this, but as an American who has watched this unfolding here in the States, and who was onto this horrifying fraud from April 2020, I am so full of outrage that I have to assume that the country where Covid comes from is a very dangerous place for whistle blowers... and there's quite a bit of evidence for that, as well, if one has been paying any attention for the past 70 years' worth of history...
The argument is flawed from the start. There was no need for any of the hysteria at all! Why? Because it was known as early as March-April 2020 that the virus was treatable with therapeutics such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Equity is out the window when the suppression of this basic FACT - that the virus was treatable and not as deadly as it was made out to be by the network of propagandists. There should be no argument or contestation re; whether individual rights or for the good of society. Its bogus when the whole situation was a big sham YET caused immense harm, suffering and death. The last 2 years with the Emergency Health Orders and subsequent restrictions should never have happened, not even for a pandemic, as nothing justifies the suspension of our human rights and rule of law. Instead it was all about corrupted individuals lining their pockets from profits of a very bad vaccine.
I must take issue with the underlying assumption of your thought exercise, and view that as betraying the root problem at hand. If we are to cast aside the primacy of individual rights, at any point, we are subverting the entire enterprise of a free society. The fact that you would patronize those who would hold this view as "fundamentalist" and "not a reasonable stance" suggests that you are beginning from a tenuous position. These rights are in fact "fundamental" to all that follows, and it is the process of justifying exemptions to our natural rights that has led to the erosion of free society in favor of an authoritarian state.
A missing element in your example with Bill and his land is that there is no counter-reasoning to your "all-or-nothing" proposal by the state. For example, if one cannon on Bill's property would repel the invasion, would perhaps two cannons on his willing neighbor's property be sufficient? What of placing mines or obstacles just off the coast? Point being, there are usually alternative solutions and if you favor the state's proposal by default (chevron deference, I believe), you then open the door to all manner of "fuckery", as Jaan so eloquently put it.
When the state merely has to claim "public good" in order to circumvent individual rights and liberties, this incentivizes broadening what this encompasses. If we delineate the scope and duration of this "temporary" order to supersede the rights of the individual through attachment to an "emergency" situation, then the state simply has to broaden what constitutes an emergency. This seems strangely familiar somehow, though I cannot quite put my finger on it.
In my opinion, it is precisely because judges/chancellors hold the views that you stated regarding individual rights vs. public good that has led us down the slippery slope to where we are today.
Who are you? I think I love you. What a wonderful paper full of insights, clarity and acknowledgement that what has taken place over the past two years has been a “death lottery”. Thank you.
Even the spike in Maskachusetts deaths early in the alleged pandemic is not proof of any emergency. The deaths could well have been caused by the government through harm protocols such as ventilators and remdesivir.
You don’t need corruption to explain the government reaction. It’s simply a reaction to calls by the ignorant and propagandized populace to do “something”. I call it bandwagery.
You have captured my anger my sadness and my passion.
I have to make a couple of points... In the US Constitution, there is no time or "emergency" that allows for a "suspension of rights" that includes a mandatory invasive medical procedure, forced isolation of the healthy, medical directives like mask-wearing being forced on healthy people, nor an implementation of Martial Law without Due Cause, which must be PROVEN, not simply asserted. There occurred in the US, including Massachusetts, a great deal of fuckery, including monetized, outright lying about Cause of Death, monetized assignment of diagnoses of "Covid," lies regarding the patient load of hospitals, "truckloads" of dead bodies being removed from hospitals, symptom of "covid" patients, strange mass deaths in residential facilities for the elderly, flagrant misuse of the PCR (the entire basis of the "pandemic" and utterly, and knowingly, fraudulent), and copious other lies, such as mandating masks, which are utterly useless in anything to do with "viruses," and harmful "on the face" of it, cheap and highly effective drugs were pulled off the shelves (HCQ and later IVM) very early on, and during the entire two years of Crimes Against Humanity, fear mongering was on full throttle from the beginning. All for something that was actually a patented bio-weapon and/or radiation poisoning with a 99.9% survival rate, which stomped the basis for the EUA situation from the beginning. Due to the fraud of mis-representation of Cause of Death, the monetization of diagnostics AND treatment, AND the outcome (ongoing) of the inoculation campaign, we can draw no other conclusion that this is Genocide, plain and simple. The Yearly Death Rate numbers in 2020 were not particularly different from the previous ten years for the US, but the sharp rise in deaths in the Spring of 2021 and continuing to current time, show nothing less than a pointing finger at the these "vaccines," which do not prevent transmission, nor the "disease" (most likely more of the bio-weapon itself, or 5G, or both). The clear evidence that at least some of the jabs contained graphene oxide and other metallic elements such as aluminum and mercury, for example, which are reactive with 5G, and toxic even without it, is very obvious hints that there is a global cull going on.
Why we are not seeing more lawsuits, especially after copious evidence has been gathered for this purpose by Reiner Fuellmich and his colleagues is a question, though lawsuits are notorious, at least in the US, for being infuriatingly SLOW. I've probably stepped on your toes with this, but as an American who has watched this unfolding here in the States, and who was onto this horrifying fraud from April 2020, I am so full of outrage that I have to assume that the country where Covid comes from is a very dangerous place for whistle blowers... and there's quite a bit of evidence for that, as well, if one has been paying any attention for the past 70 years' worth of history...
The argument is flawed from the start. There was no need for any of the hysteria at all! Why? Because it was known as early as March-April 2020 that the virus was treatable with therapeutics such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Equity is out the window when the suppression of this basic FACT - that the virus was treatable and not as deadly as it was made out to be by the network of propagandists. There should be no argument or contestation re; whether individual rights or for the good of society. Its bogus when the whole situation was a big sham YET caused immense harm, suffering and death. The last 2 years with the Emergency Health Orders and subsequent restrictions should never have happened, not even for a pandemic, as nothing justifies the suspension of our human rights and rule of law. Instead it was all about corrupted individuals lining their pockets from profits of a very bad vaccine.
I must take issue with the underlying assumption of your thought exercise, and view that as betraying the root problem at hand. If we are to cast aside the primacy of individual rights, at any point, we are subverting the entire enterprise of a free society. The fact that you would patronize those who would hold this view as "fundamentalist" and "not a reasonable stance" suggests that you are beginning from a tenuous position. These rights are in fact "fundamental" to all that follows, and it is the process of justifying exemptions to our natural rights that has led to the erosion of free society in favor of an authoritarian state.
A missing element in your example with Bill and his land is that there is no counter-reasoning to your "all-or-nothing" proposal by the state. For example, if one cannon on Bill's property would repel the invasion, would perhaps two cannons on his willing neighbor's property be sufficient? What of placing mines or obstacles just off the coast? Point being, there are usually alternative solutions and if you favor the state's proposal by default (chevron deference, I believe), you then open the door to all manner of "fuckery", as Jaan so eloquently put it.
When the state merely has to claim "public good" in order to circumvent individual rights and liberties, this incentivizes broadening what this encompasses. If we delineate the scope and duration of this "temporary" order to supersede the rights of the individual through attachment to an "emergency" situation, then the state simply has to broaden what constitutes an emergency. This seems strangely familiar somehow, though I cannot quite put my finger on it.
In my opinion, it is precisely because judges/chancellors hold the views that you stated regarding individual rights vs. public good that has led us down the slippery slope to where we are today.
Well done, and indisputable. Thank you.
I will try to bring this piece to the attention of those capable of grasping it and passing it along to those in the legal profession.
There was no virus.
Average age of convid death was around life expectancy before the jabs.
Total deaths in 2020 in most nations was in line with past years. Yes, even with the medical murder of remdesevir and ventilators.
Notice how before the pandemic, there was a constant less than average death rate, during the winter when expected?
The vaccines came out and we see in the graphs that there's a steady higher than average death rate... But they call it Covid
Average age of death is lower now...
Make up variants etc. Make sure the real cause isn't known.
L with polio, caused by pesticide
Smallpox , sanitation and water issues
AIDS, azt and other drugs
And so on.
Virus theory is fraudulent
Hear hear!
Who are you? I think I love you. What a wonderful paper full of insights, clarity and acknowledgement that what has taken place over the past two years has been a “death lottery”. Thank you.
Even the spike in Maskachusetts deaths early in the alleged pandemic is not proof of any emergency. The deaths could well have been caused by the government through harm protocols such as ventilators and remdesivir.
If you grant the government the power to suspend the laws in an emergency, the government will invent emergencies in order to suspend the laws.
We must do something.
This is “something”.
Then we must do it.
You don’t need corruption to explain the government reaction. It’s simply a reaction to calls by the ignorant and propagandized populace to do “something”. I call it bandwagery.
Bravo!!
Outstanding. Again.
Virtuous and melancholy.
Well said!